4k-led7 min read

Samsung U8000F 43-inch Price Per Inch (2026)

By Jon Levesque··Updated May 11, 2026

Key Takeaway

The Samsung U8000F 43-inch 4K TV costs $229.99 at Samsung US — that’s $5.35 per inch. We compare it to the cheapest 43-inch 4K LED TVs and show where the real value sits in May 2026.

As of May 2026, the Samsung U8000F 43‑inch 4K TV is listed at $229.99 on Samsung US, giving a price per inch of $5.35. That’s 53% higher than the cheapest 43‑inch LED TV in our live market data — the Vizio 43‑inch at $3.49 per inch ($150). The TCL 43S551G, at $4.40 per inch, also undercuts Samsung. Buyers focused on the lowest $/inch should weigh these alternatives against Samsung’s brand familiarity.

Samsung U8000F 43‑Inch Price Per Inch: The Numbers

Samsung US currently lists the U8000F 43‑inch 4K Crystal UHD Smart TV at $229.99. Divide that by the 43‑inch screen size and you get a cost of $5.35 per inch. That figure comes directly from Samsung’s official online store — it’s the price any buyer sees if they purchase the set directly from the manufacturer, without any third‑party discount.

This $5.35/inch number is useful because it strips away marketing and lets you compare screen real‑estate costs across brands and technologies in a completely uniform way. That uniformity is why we track $/inch across every 4K LED TV in our database, not just Samsung. For context, the U8000F’s $5.35 sits well above the absolute floor of the 4K LED category: across all in‑stock sizes we track, the cheapest LED TV per inch is the Westinghouse 58‑inch at $3.28 per inch ($190 ÷ 58). But a $3.28/in 58‑inch set is irrelevant to someone who needs a 43‑inch TV, so we always compare within the same screen size when a size‑specific keyword like “43‑inch” is targeted.

Among the 43‑inch 4K LED TVs that are actually in stock and tracked live, the Vizio 43‑inch is the cheapest at $3.49 per inch ($150 ÷ 43), and the TCL 43S551G follows at $4.40 per inch ($189 ÷ 43). The Samsung U8000F, at $5.35/in., is 53% more expensive per diagonal inch than the Vizio and 22% more than the TCL. (The math: ($5.35 – $3.49) / $3.49 = 0.533, or 53.3%; ($5.35 – $4.40) / $4.40 = 0.216, or 21.6%.)

How It Compares to Other 43‑Inch 4K TVs

If price per inch is your main yardstick, the Samsung U8000F is not the most efficient way to buy a 43‑inch 4K screen. The live market data for 4K LED TVs shows two 43‑inch options that deliver more inches of screen for every dollar spent.

Top Picks by $/GB

View all →
Prices updated daily. Affiliate links — we earn from qualifying purchases.

The table above is drawn from our live category floor; the cheapest two 43‑inch sets are the Vizio 43‑inch at $3.49/in. and the TCL S5 S‑Class at $4.40/in. Both are substantially below the Samsung’s $5.35/in. The Vizio carries Dolby Vision HDR and WiFi 6 (as stated in its listing), while the TCL 43S551G is a Google TV model. Samsung’s U8000F, a Crystal UHD set, does not appear in our live tracking — its price reflects a direct purchase from Samsung US.

What that means for a buyer: if you simply want the lowest out‑of‑pocket cost for a 43‑inch 4K TV you can drive home today, the Vizio 43‑inch at $150 ($3.49/in.) is the cheapest among 43‑inch options tracked. The Samsung costs $79.99 more, and you get no extra screen area for that money.

None of this says the U8000F is overpriced in an absolute sense; it’s simply priced above the size‑matched field. The gap is 53% above the Vizio and 22% above the TCL, which is a clear premium for the Samsung badge.

Is the U8000F the Best Value for Your Budget?

For a 43‑inch 4K TV buyer in May 2026, “best value” splits into two definitions. If value means the smallest possible price for a working 43‑inch 4K screen, the U8000F is not the answer — the Vizio 43‑inch at $150 delivers the same screen size for $79.99 less. The TCL 43S551G also saves $41.

If, however, value includes factors like brand trust, warranty support, or integration with other Samsung devices, then the U8000F’s $5.35/in. may still be defensible. But from a pure $/inch standpoint, it’s the most expensive of the three 43‑inch sets we have live pricing for.

It’s also worth noting that the category floor for 4K LED across all sizes is $3.28/in. (Westinghouse 58‑inch). That’s 39% cheaper per inch than the U8000F, but comparing a 58‑inch floor to a 43‑inch target is only useful if you can physically accommodate a larger TV. If 43 inches is your hard limit, then the Vizio at $3.49/in. is your price‑per‑inch baseline.

Why Price Per Inch Matters When Buying a 4K TV

TV prices are messy because screen size, resolution, and brand all interact in non‑linear ways. A $200 32‑inch TV can look cheap until you see it costs $6.25/in., while a $190 58‑inch Westinghouse costs only $3.28/in. That’s the rationale behind $/inch: it normalizes price to the one thing you can’t change after buying — the physical screen area.

When you calculate $/inch for the Samsung U8000F, you get $5.35. That’s immediately comparable to the Vizio at $3.49 and the TCL at $4.40. The difference makes the Samsung’s premium quantifiable rather than vague. This same arithmetic works for any TV category: we track OLED ($10.23/in. floor) and QLED ($3.88/in. floor) the same way.

💡When comparing TV value across different sizes, always compute $/inch.

Just as we track storage costs in dollars per gigabyte (SSD, hard drives), $/inch is the neutral metric for screen purchases. The Samsung U8000F’s $5.35/in. is a fact, not an opinion — and it’s a fact that puts two lower‑priced 43‑inch alternatives squarely on the map.

Conclusion – Should You Buy the U8000F in 2026?

The Samsung U8000F 43‑inch costs $229.99, or $5.35 per inch, as of May 2026. It is not the cheapest 43‑inch 4K LED TV — the Vizio 43‑inch at $150 ($3.49/in.) and the TCL 43S551G at $189 ($4.40/in.) both undercut it. The $/inch gap is 53% to the Vizio and 22% to the TCL.

If you’re shopping strictly for the lowest dollar‑per‑diagonal‑inch among 43‑inch 4K TVs, the numbers point away from Samsung. But if integrated smart features, the Samsung brand ecosystem, or personal preference outweigh a $80 premium, the U8000F remains a straightforward 4K option. Just know that the price‑per‑inch math says you’re paying extra for the logo, not for additional screen.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the price per inch of the Samsung U8000F 43‑inch TV?

The Samsung U8000F 43‑inch is priced at $229.99 on Samsung US, which works out to $5.35 per inch ($229.99 ÷ 43). This figure reflects the direct manufacturer price as of May 2026.

How does the Samsung U8000F compare to other 43‑inch 4K TVs in cost per inch?

It’s more expensive per inch than the two cheapest 43‑inch 4K LED TVs in our live tracking. The Vizio 43‑inch costs $3.49 per inch ($150) — Samsung is 53% more expensive per inch — and the TCL 43S551G costs $4.40 per inch ($189) — Samsung is 22% more expensive per inch.

Is the Samsung U8000F the cheapest Samsung 43‑inch TV available?

We cannot confirm whether Samsung offers a lower‑priced 43‑inch model in its lineup; no other current Samsung 43‑inch 4K TV appears in our live DB listings. The U8000F is the only Samsung 43‑inch with a verifiable direct price at time of writing.

Where can I find the best deal on the Samsung U8000F 43‑inch?

At the moment, the U8000F is listed at $229.99 on Samsung US. Because it is not tracked in third‑party retailer data, we can’t compare alternative merchant prices. Buyers aiming for the lowest out‑of‑pocket cost on a 43‑inch 4K TV should check the Vizio 43‑inch at $150 and the TCL 43S551G at $189.

Are there any 43‑inch TVs cheaper per inch than the Samsung U8000F?

Yes. Both the Vizio 43‑inch ($3.49/in.) and the TCL 43S551G ($4.40/in.) offer lower price per inch than the Samsung U8000F’s $5.35/in. The Westinghouse 58‑inch at $3.28/in. is even cheaper per inch, but that’s a much larger screen size and isn’t relevant for someone shopping for a 43‑inch TV.

Related Products