As of May 27, 2026, Samsung has no 65-inch OLED TV in our tracked listings. Its cheapest 65-inch model is a Neo QLED at $16.92/inch, versus LG's cheapest 65-inch OLED (C3) at $18.87/inch. For a pure OLED comparison, LG is the only option.
The Short Answer
Samsung’s cheapest 65-inch TV—a Neo QLED bundle with a soundbar—costs $16.92/inch, while LG’s cheapest 65-inch OLED (the C3) costs $18.87/inch. That’s a difference of $1.95/inch, or $126.76 less for the Samsung. However, Samsung does not offer a 65-inch OLED in our live tracker, so this isn’t an OLED‑to‑OLED matchup.
Price Per Inch Breakdown
The two products we can compare at 65 inches are:
- Samsung QN65QN70FAFXZA (Neo QLED) – $1,099.99 at Newegg → $16.92/inch. This price includes a Samsung HW‑B630F 3.1‑channel soundbar with Dolby Audio.
- LG OLED evo C3 (OLED65C3PUA) – $1,226.75 at Newegg → $18.87/inch. This is the TV only; no soundbar or other accessories.
The absolute price gap is $126.76 ($1,226.75 − $1,099.99), or $1.95/inch. Both listings were current as of May 27, 2026.
Same Capacity, Same Tier?
Both are 65-inch TVs, but the panel technologies differ:
They serve different picture quality tiers. A direct 65-inch OLED vs OLED comparison is impossible because no Samsung 65-inch OLED appears in our tracked data as of today. The Samsung product is the closest 65-inch alternative Samsung currently offers according to our live listings.
What the Extra Cost Buys You
The $126.76 higher price for the LG C3 does not come with a soundbar. Here’s what you’re buying for that extra spend:
- OLED panel: self‑emissive pixels deliver true blacks and per‑pixel illumination.
- No soundbar included: the Samsung price bundles a 3.1ch Dolby Audio soundbar, whereas the LG is television alone.
- Model year: LG C3 is a 2023 model; Samsung QN70F is a 2025 model (based on SKU, but neither listing states feature differences beyond panel type).
The extra $126.76 buys you an OLED panel; whether that’s worth it depends entirely on your viewing priorities.
When Each Makes Sense
- Choose the Samsung Neo QLED if your top priority is lowest price per inch for a 65-inch screen and the bundled soundbar adds practical value. You save $126.76 and get an out‑of‑the‑box audio solution, even though it’s not OLED.
- Choose the LG OLED if you’re set on OLED’s self‑emissive technology and infinite contrast — and you’re willing to pay $126.76 more without a soundbar.
Verdict
Samsung wins on pure $/inch at $16.92 vs. LG’s $18.87, but it’s important to note this compares a Neo QLED to an OLED, not two OLEDs. Prices were verified on May 27, 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Samsung 65-inch TV in the comparison actually an OLED?
No. It is not an OLED TV. Our live data contains no 65-inch Samsung OLED.
Why doesn’t the data show a Samsung 65-inch OLED TV?
Samsung has not listed a 65-inch OLED in the retailers and marketplaces we track as of May 27, 2026. This could mean none are currently in stock, or Samsung’s 65-inch OLED lineup isn’t actively sold through our tracked channels. We can only report what is live right now.
Which LG 65-inch OLED model is the cheapest per inch?
The cheapest LG 65-inch OLED we track is the OLED evo C3 (OLED65C3PUA) at $1,226.75 — $18.87/inch. Other 65‑inch OLED listings may exist at different retailers, but this is the floor in our live database.
Is the $/inch difference between Neo QLED and OLED significant enough to sway a purchase?
That depends on your priorities. The Samsung saves $126.76 and includes a soundbar, which could tip the decision for buyers who value out‑of‑the‑box audio. Data shows no Samsung OLED alternative at this size, so the choice is between Samsung’s Neo QLED and LG’s true OLED.