Samsung vs TeamGroup Computer RAM

Side-by-side price per gigabyte comparison across 86 products.

As of June 2026, Samsung averages $11.5771/GB across 68 products while TeamGroup averages $10.9186/GB across 18 products on BuyPerUnit. TeamGroup offers 6% better value per gigabyte for computer ram.

Samsung

Avg $/GB$11.5771
Best $/GB$6.1875
Price Range$6.1875 – $27.4994
Products68

TeamGroup

Better Value
Avg $/GB$10.9186
Best $/GB$6.2809
Price Range$6.2809 – $18.4369
Products18

Top Products Compared

RankBrandProductCapacity$/GBPriceRetailer
1SamsungSamsung 16GB DDR4 2400MHz PC4-19200 1.2V 2Rx8 288-Pin UDIMM Desktop RAM Memory Module M378A2K43CB1-CRC16GB$6.1875$99.00newegg
1TeamGroupTEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 32GB Kit (2 x 16GB) 3200MHz (PC4-25600) CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V UDIMM 288 Pin PC Computer Desktop Memory Module Ram Upgrade - TED432G3200C22DC0132 GB$6.2809$200.99amazon
2SamsungSamsung 32GB DDR4 2666MHz RAM Memory Module for Laptop Computers (260 Pin SODIMM, 1.2V) M471A4G43MB132 GB$6.1875$198.00amazon
2TeamGroupTEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 16GB Kit (2 x 8GB) 3200MHz PC4-25600 CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V SODIMM 260-Pin Laptop Notebook PC Computer Memory Module Ram Upgrade - TED416G3200C22DC-S0116 GB$7.1244$113.99amazon
3SamsungSamsung 32GB DDR4 3200MHz PC4-25600 (PC4-3200AA) CL22 UDIMM 2Rx8 Dual Rank 1.2V Non-ECC DIMM 288-Pin Desktop PC RAM Memory32 GB$6.2337$199.48amazon
3TeamGroupTEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 16GB Kit (2 x 8GB) 3200MHz (PC4-25600) CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V UDIMM 288 Pin PC Computer Desktop Memory Module Ram Upgrade - TED416G3200C22DC0116 GB$7.1244$113.99amazon
4Samsung16GB RAM Replacement for Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC, M471A2K43CB1-CRC DDR4 2400MHz PC4-19200 SODIMM 2Rx8 Laptop Memory16GB$6.2881$100.61newegg
4TeamGroupTEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 8GB Single 3200MHz PC4-25600 CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V SODIMM 260-Pin Laptop Notebook PC Computer Memory Module Ram Upgrade - TED48G3200C22-S018 GB$7.2488$57.99amazon
5SamsungSamsung 16GB DDR4 2666MHz PC4-21300 (PC4-2666V) CL19 SODIMM 2Rx8 Dual Rank 1.2V 260-Pin Laptop, Notebook RAM Memory16 GB$6.5056$104.09amazon
5TeamGroupTEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 16GB Single 3200MHz PC4-25600 CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V SODIMM 260-Pin Laptop Memory Module Ram Upgrade -TED416G3200C22-S0116 GB$7.2494$115.99amazon

Which Should You Buy?

Based on current pricing data, TeamGroup offers better overall value for computer ram at an average of $10.9186/GB compared to Samsung's $11.5771/GB — that's roughly 6% less per gigabyte.

TeamGroup's best deal is the TEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 32GB Kit (2 x 16GB) 3200MHz (PC4-25600) CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V UDIMM 288 Pin PC Computer Desktop Memory Module Ram Upgrade - TED432G3200C22DC01 (32 GB) at $6.2809/GB, while Samsung's cheapest option is the Samsung 16GB DDR4 2400MHz PC4-19200 1.2V 2Rx8 288-Pin UDIMM Desktop RAM Memory Module M378A2K43CB1-CRC (16GB) at $6.1875/GB.

However, price per GB isn't everything — consider factors like warranty, performance specs, and your specific capacity needs. Check individual product pages for detailed specifications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Samsung or TeamGroup cheaper per GB for computer ram?

As of June 2026, TeamGroup averages $10.9186/GB compared to Samsung at $11.5771/GB. TeamGroup is approximately 6% cheaper per gigabyte on average.

How many Samsung and TeamGroup computer ram does BuyPerUnit track?

BuyPerUnit currently tracks 68 Samsung products and 18 TeamGroup products in the computer ram category, all ranked by price per gigabyte.

What is the cheapest Samsung computer ram per GB?

The cheapest Samsung option is the Samsung 16GB DDR4 2400MHz PC4-19200 1.2V 2Rx8 288-Pin UDIMM Desktop RAM Memory Module M378A2K43CB1-CRC at $6.1875/GB ($99.00 for 16GB).

What is the cheapest TeamGroup computer ram per GB?

The cheapest TeamGroup option is the TEAMGROUP Elite DDR4 32GB Kit (2 x 16GB) 3200MHz (PC4-25600) CL22 Unbuffered Non-ECC 1.2V UDIMM 288 Pin PC Computer Desktop Memory Module Ram Upgrade - TED432G3200C22DC01 at $6.2809/GB ($200.99 for 32 GB).

Explore More

Submit a Better Deal

Help others save money

Report an Issue

Help us keep data accurate